Bryn Morgan
Chapter 6 discusses the shallow coat of advertising that is aimed at creating a “pop culture” message. Through this, they sometimes use nonhuman, “earth friendly” qualities to make people feel better about what they’re buying. By appealing to emotions, advertisers can skip over the real facts, and prey on the buyers “sense of doing the right thing.” Ads use a variety of techniques to appeal to the buyer, but the overall intent is the same: creating a desire for products and equating consumption with status and happiness. They do this by influencing the social trends in place, and making people feel like they’re forced to keep up with the rest of society. As people see these ads and become further and further detached from the natural world, we can only see the gap between humans and nature widening.
Chapter 7 deals with the humanistic attitudes toward animals, and where they come from. In short, the way we think of animals has come from messages that the pop culture has served us (in my case, it was Disney movies). Through false depictions of animals, humans have inferred certain messages, experiences, and emotions toward animals. This chapter also discusses the human need for animals, and how we need some sort of mystery or wonder outside our culture. Additionally, our attitudes toward nature are subjective; meaning we think about ourselves first in the context about why we care about animals and which ones we care about most. We see certain human characteristics in animals, which forms attachments to some, and hatred towards others. Whatever the attitude may be, animals have a large presence in our lives (so much that we have zoos for the purpose of observing them), and in order to preserve the future of animals, we must mend our actions and feelings toward them.
Chapter 8 focuses on the role of news and media in society, and the real process behind how a story is found, created, and presented to the public. Through all this, chapter 8 remains adamant that, though the media should be partially credited for the current importance of environmental protection among Americans, we are unable to rely on them as a “watchdog” for the environment. Instead of invoking some sort of great environmental change, the media goes with the grain of the current social environment. Though we tend to think of media outlets as independent, the majority of their stories come from entities “seeking news coverage.” Therefore, environmental groups with less funding, often start out at a disadvantage. The target of media outlets is usually the dominant class in society, and therefore, there is a bias in the stories that are covered. There are also the issues of how a story is framed, whether it is event-driven, or whether or not there are economic constraints. In short, there are many layers underneath a news story. Due to several limiting factors, the media follows the dominant power structure and has to abide by their rules.
Reflection:
My frustration comes mostly from chapters 6 and 8. Though I find humanistic attitudes and emotions toward nature extremely important, I feel like they are very possible to change. Children grow up with a very shallow interpretation of the wild, and as individuals become more educated about the ecology of our planet, I think appreciation for all species will be more widely accepted. Chapters 6 and 8, however, leave me feeling very discouraged. The advertising business is extremely powerful (due to the monetary value behind them), and since they plays a pivotal role in our media, I feel like society will continue to be controlled and manipulated to think they way they want us to. Though we live in a “free” country with a capitalist market, I feel like the U.S. is more communist than I ever realized. Whoever has the thickest wallet seems to have the upper hand, and without a large majority of people to expose it, they will continue to. How does our society get the word out when every media outlet is eating from the hand of the ad industry?!